If you sell globally from India, the first real question isn’t “Which provider is best?”

It’s: How do your customers prefer to pay you?

Some customers want the speed and familiarity of card payments (especially for smaller tickets, online purchases, or urgent payments). Others, especially in B2B, prefer bank transfers against invoices (ACH/<a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/what-are-sepa-transfers">sepa</a>/wire).

A payment gateway for international payments is excellent when you’re collecting card payments. But it isn’t the only way to receive international money, and for many Indian exporters and service businesses, a good setup looks like this:

This guide breaks down what an international payment gateway really is, how it differs from other collection methods, and gives you a practical way to pick the best approach.

An international payment gateway is a tool that securely processes online card payments from customers in different countries.

Best for: checkout-led card payments (e-commerce, subscriptions, online services, payment links).

Also important: Many businesses use both card + bank transfer, based on customer preference.

What is a “payment gateway for international payments”?

A payment gateway for international payments is the secure bridge between your checkout (or payment page) and the systems that approve a card transaction.

The “international” part adds extra layers like:

None of this is “bad”; it’s simply the reality of card networks across borders, and it’s why choosing the right tool matters.

Payment gateway vs payment processor (not the same thing)

People use these interchangeably, but technically, they’re different.

Many modern providers bundle both, which is why the terms blur. But when you compare options, it helps to separate them, because fees and responsibilities can sit in different parts of the stack.

The #1 misconception: calling every international payment tool a “gateway”

A lot of exporters and freelancers call any platform that helps them receive international money a “payment gateway.”

In reality, international payment collection usually falls into three buckets:

1) Card payment gateways (checkout/card rails)

Card rails optimize for convenience and global acceptance, and you get a structured system for refunds/disputes when needed.

2) Bank transfer collection (invoice-led B2B)

This is how many B2B clients prefer to pay:

This method avoids card networks entirely and is often a smoother match for invoicing and larger ticket sizes.

3) Marketplace payouts / remittance platforms

Used when money comes from platforms like:

These are payout workflows, not customer-facing checkouts.

Practical tip: If most of your revenue is invoice-led and clients already prefer bank transfers, you don’t need to “convert” them to cards. But it can still be smart to keep card as an option for clients who specifically want it.

How to choose the best international payment gateway in India (the decision framework)

The best provider depends less on brand names and more on your payment reality.&nbsp;

Step 2: Compare on the things that actually change your payout

1) Total cost (not just the headline fee)

3) Authentication + payment success rate

<a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/cross-border-payments">cross-border payments</a> are more likely to face additional authentication.
A gateway that handles global authentication well can improve successful collections.

Cards naturally come with a formal dispute and refund structure. That can be useful in consumer-style transactions, and more effortful in high-ticket B2B unless you’re set up for it.

A faster settlement cycle improves working capital—especially if you run ads, payroll, or vendor payments.

Do you need a full checkout integration, plugins, payment links, or APIs?
And when something breaks, can you reach a human?

International payment gateway list (India): options by use-case

Instead of ranking them blindly, here’s a cleaner way to shortlist.

A) India-first gateways (strong fit for India-based businesses selling globally via cards)

These are typically great if you want international card acceptance with an India-first setup.

B) Global gateways (popular for SaaS/subscriptions + global-first payment stacks)

<a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/stripe-india-charges-review-alternatives">stripe</a> / Adyen / Worldpay

Where Skydo fits (and why it’s not “gateway vs Skydo”: it’s “rails + flexibility”)

If your business is invoice-led (exports/services), you typically want bank transfer rails as the default. But it’s also smart to support card payments for clients who prefer them.

Skydo isn’t a traditional “international payment gateway.” It’s a collections platform built for receiving international payments in India, with both bank transfer rails and card support where needed.

For Indian exporters &amp; service businesses: when a gateway may not be necessary (but card can still be useful)

Gateways are excellent when you’re collecting card payments regularly. But if your core business is invoice-led, many teams prefer to avoid making cards the default, simply because the economics and workflow can differ.

Here are the real considerations (worded without “deriding” cards):

The balanced strategy most businesses land on:
Use bank transfer rails as the default for invoices, and keep cards available for clients who prefer them.

Step 1: Do customers pay via online checkout using cards/wallets?

Yes → Start with an international payment gateway.

large_Payment Gateway

medium_Payment Gateway

small_Payment Gateway

thumbnail_Payment Gateway

Payment Gateway

You've just finished a project for a client in the US. Invoice sent, work delivered. Now you're waiting for the payment to hit your account. But instead of a quick transfer, you're dealing with currency conversion, multiple bank fees, and a five-day wait. Welcome to <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/cross-border-payments">cross-border payments</a>. And you're not alone; cross-border transactions form a massive global market, valued at over $194 trillion in 2024 and projected to exceed <a href="ttps://www.financialprofessionals.org/glossary/cross-border-payments#:~:text=Cross,through%202027%20to%20reach%20a)">$290 trillion by 2030.</a> However, each payment comes with complexities that extend&nbsp;far beyond a simple bank transfer.

What are cross-border payments? At its simplest, a cross-border payment happens when money moves between countries. For businesses, these aren't simple one-click transactions. B2B cross-border payments involve matching invoices, contracts with specific payment terms, compliance documentation for tax authorities, and careful reconciliation for your accounting team. When you receive payment from an international client, you're not just getting paid; you're managing a paper trail for GST filings, maintaining records for audits, and ensuring everything matches up for your CA (Chartered Accountant).

Cross-border transactions can vary across industries and scenarios. For example, a SaaS company might invoice its Australian client monthly. A digital marketing agency could collect a quarterly retainer from Singapore. An exporter receives payment for goods shipped to Germany. Each transaction crosses borders, requires currency conversion, and generates documentation at every step.

How a Cross-Border B2B Payment Moves Through Banks

When you initiate an international payment to a vendor or client, your money doesn't travel directly from your account to theirs. Instead, it moves through several steps, each adding time and cost to the transaction:

Each of these steps can introduce delays or costs. Now, let's explore the different ways businesses can send or receive cross-border payments and the expenses involved at each stage.

Common Methods for B2B Cross-Border Payments

Businesses have several options for sending and receiving international payments, each with trade-offs in speed, cost, and convenience. The main methods include traditional bank wires and newer fintech solutions:

1. SWIFT Wire Transfers (Traditional Bank Transfers)

This is the classic method for B2B cross-border payments. A SWIFT wire transfer moves money through the global banking network, so you can send money to virtually any country with an established banking system. The universal reach makes it reliable for large transactions or payments to countries where other options aren’t available.

However, the downsides are significant. Fees can pile up depending on how many correspondent banks handle your payment, and you often won’t know the exact cost until the transfer is complete. Settlement can take 3–5 business days or longer. There’s also the risk of short payments, where the recipient receives less than the invoiced amount because <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/intermediary-bank-meaning-and-hidden-fees">intermediary banks</a> deducted fees along the way without warning.

2. Local Bank Transfers via Virtual Accounts

Some modern payment providers offer <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/virtual-account-numbers">virtual local receiving accounts</a> in various countries, even if your business is based elsewhere. Essentially, the provider gives you local bank account details (like an account number/routing for the US, or <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/what-is-sort-code">sort code</a>/account for the UK) to share with your international clients. The client pays locally into that account, as if you were a domestic business in their country. For the client, it’s just a local transfer, no international wire fees or complex SWIFT forms.

For you, the provider then transfers the money to your home account (converting currency as needed). This method can avoid surprise intermediary fees because the initial transfer stays within the local banking system. The cost savings depend on the provider and currency corridor; not all providers support every country or currency combination. Still, using virtual local accounts often results in faster settlements (sometimes 1–2 days) and more predictable fees than a SWIFT wire.

In some cases, businesses accept credit card or online gateway payments for B2B invoices. This can work well when you need payment immediately or for smaller invoice amounts. The speed is unmatched – funds can arrive within minutes or hours, rather than days. However, for international transfers, while the fund transfer can be super quick, withdrawing it in your local currency might take more time.&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;Processing fees for card payments typically range from 2% to 5% of the transaction, plus some platforms and gateways levy an extra 1%–4% <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/forex-markup-fee-explained">forex markup</a> for cross-border card transactions. These fees add up quickly on larger invoices.&nbsp;

Cross-Border Payment Fees Explained (The Full Stack)

International payments come with multiple layers of fees that can eat into the amount you ultimately receive (or the amount your client has to pay). Understanding each cost in this fee stack will help you budget accurately and choose the most cost-effective payment method.

Whether you go through a traditional bank or an online platform, there are likely base fees for moving money internationally:

In summary, the bank-route fees can stack up from both ends (sender and receiver), whereas a platform fee might consolidate pricing but add its own cut. Always check both what the sender pays and what the receiver pays, because together they determine the true cost of transfer.

Currency conversion is often the biggest hidden expense in cross-border payments. Banks and many payment providers do not convert your money at the mid-market exchange rate (the real rate you see on Google or XE). Instead, they apply a markup or spread on the exchange rate as a form of commission.

Typically, banks might add a markup in the range of 2% to 4% above the mid-market rate for retail customers. Some fintech platforms might be lower (say 1%), but others can be even higher under certain circumstances. This markup is usually not disclosed explicitly; you won't see a line item saying "FX fee". It’s embedded in the rate you're quoted.

How to spot the FX cost: Suppose you need to receive £1,000 from a UK client. If the mid-market GBP/INR rate is 100, the true value of that payment is ₹100,000. If your bank credits you at a rate of 97 INR/GBP, you get ₹97,000. That implies a 3% markup (since 97 is 3% less than 100). In this example, ₹3,000 is effectively the fee taken as an exchange spread. The only way you realise this is by comparing the rate you got to the market rate at that time. Providers advertising "zero fees" often still make money by doing this – they waive transfer fees but give you an unfavourable exchange rate.

Over large transactions, the FX markup cost can dwarf the explicit fees. Always check the effective exchange rate. A quick method is to divide the final INR you got by the foreign currency amount to see what rate was used, then compare it to the market rate. The difference (in percentage) is what you paid for conversion.

Fee Instructions: OUR vs SHA vs BEN&nbsp;

When your international client sends you a SWIFT payment, their bank asks them to choose a fee instruction, OUR, SHA, or BEN. That single choice directly affects how much money actually lands in your Indian bank account.

Here’s what each option means for you as the receiver:

OUR – Best for You (Full Amount Received)

SHA – Shared Fees (You Often Get Short-Paid)

BEN – Worst for You (You Pay Everything)

Cross-Border Payment Cost Examples (Realistic Scenarios)

To put all these fees and FX costs into perspective, let's walk through a few realistic scenarios. These examples illustrate how much money might actually arrive versus what was sent, and why there's often a difference. (Exact fees will vary by banks and corridors, but we'll use representative figures.)

Example 1: $5,000 B2B invoice paid via SWIFT (SHA instruction) – Your U.S. client sends you $5,000 through a traditional wire, with fees set to SHA (shared). Suppose their bank charged a $30 wire fee, and two intermediary banks in the U.S. deducted $20 each. Your Indian bank also takes an inward fee of ₹1,000 (about $12). In addition, the currency conversion to INR had a 3% markup on the exchange rate. By the time the payment reaches your account, you might see roughly $4,900 worth in INR. In other words, you don't get the full $5,000 – a combination of wire fees and FX markup has reduced it. This is why invoices often arrive "short" when paid by international wire on SHA: each player along the chain quietly took a bit out.

Example 2: $5,000 paid via a local receiving account transfer – Now, imagine using a fintech platform that provides local account details. Your U.S. client pays $5,000 to a domestic U.S. account (no international wire needed on their end). The platform then converts and transfers the money to you in INR. Platforms like Skydo will charge a flat USD 29 in fees and offer live forex rate without any markup. There are no intermediary bank deductions because the transfer was routed intelligently through the platform's network. You receive very close to the full $5,000 value, minus that known fee. For example, you might get the equivalent of about $4,970 in INR. Settlement is faster (maybe 1-2 business days), and you know the costs upfront. In this scenario, both you and your client avoided the mystery fees and delays of the SWIFT network.

Example 3: $5,000 paid by card or online processor – Your client pays the $5,000 using a credit card or an online payment link. The processor (e.g., a payment gateway) charges 4% + a fixed fee, and also a 3% currency <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/currency-conversion-fees">conversion fee</a>. Let's say that totals roughly 7% (about $350) in fees. You end up with about $4,650 (in INR equivalent) delivered to your account. The upside is convenience; your client gets to pay in a couple of clicks with no additional setup, but on most platforms, you effectively pay a premium for that convenience. However, platforms like Skydo let you <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/accept-credit-card-payment-us-clients">receive card payments from your US client</a> at live forex rate without any markup.&nbsp;

Factors That Change How Much Money You Actually Receive

Not every international payment lands the same way in your account. These factors directly impact the final INR amount you receive and how long it takes to get there:

Some routes (USD → INR) are cheaper and more predictable than rare corridors. Popular corridors have better FX rates and fewer hidden deductions.

Every intermediary bank in the SWIFT chain deducts a fee before the money reaches you. More hops = smaller final payout.

This single setting often explains why payments arrive short.

If your payment is flagged for review (AML/sanctions/keywords), it can sit in manual screening for 1–3 days before being credited.

If your client pays after a banking cut-off or during a holiday (in any country in the chain), your payment is pushed to the next working day.

SWIFT = slower, costly, unpredictable.
Local rails / fintech networks = faster payouts, fewer deductions.

If the transfer route forces two conversions (e.g., USD → EUR → INR), the FX markup hits you twice and your final payout drops.

Flat fees hurt small payments more; FX markups hurt large payments more. For receivers, this affects how much INR finally lands.

Businesses that receive payments regularly often get better FX rates, lower fees, or platform discounts compared to one-off receivers.

Banks vs modern platforms make the biggest difference:

Receiving International Payments in India: The Essential Paperwork

When foreign money lands in your Indian bank account, the payment isn’t “complete” until you have the required documents for tax, compliance, and audit purposes. Here are the only three things you absolutely need to track:

1. FIRA / FIRC: Proof of Inward Remittance

A Foreign Inward Remittance Advice/Certificate confirms that foreign currency was received and converted legally into INR.
You’ll need it for:

Banks may issue FIRAs automatically or only on request. Always collect it immediately so you don’t struggle with backdated requests later.

2. eBRC: Bank Realisation Certificate (For Exporters)

If you export goods (and for some categories of software), you need an Electronic <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/bank-realisation-certificate-all-you-need-to-know">bank realisation certificate</a>. It is:

Best Way to Receive B2B Cross-Border Payments in India

After navigating through the ins and outs of cross-border payments, you might wonder: Is there a simpler way to get paid from international clients, without all the surprises and delays? For many Indian businesses, specialised cross-border payment platforms provide the answer.

Platforms like Skydo are designed specifically for Indian businesses receiving B2B international payments. Skydo’s cross-border payment platform, for example, provides predictable fees with no hidden intermediary deductions. You can see the live exchange rate and any markup transparently, side by side with the mid-market rate, before you commit to a transfer. This means you know exactly how much INR you'll get for a given foreign amount – no more guesswork or shortfall.

Speed is another benefit. Instead of waiting a week for a SWIFT wire to wend its way through global banks, modern platforms often credit your funds within a day or two. They achieve this by using local routes and smarter networks (as described earlier in the local receiving accounts method), effectively cutting out unnecessary middlemen.

Crucially, these platforms also simplify compliance and documentation. Exporters and service providers can get export-grade documentation without extra hassle,&nbsp; for instance, automatic generation of FIRA/<a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/all-you-need-to-know-about-firc-a-complete-guide">firc</a> as soon as the money arrives, and even eBRC integration for Amazon exports. By building these into their workflow, platforms save you from making multiple trips (or emails) to the bank for paperwork.

If your business regularly deals with international clients, using a modern cross-border payments solution can eliminate the unpredictability of fees and delays. You’ll know in advance what each transaction will cost, and you can ensure your overseas clients have an easy, local way to pay you (which can improve your chances of getting paid on time).

In summary, the best way to receive B2B cross-border payments, especially in India, is to leverage a platform that offers transparency, speed, and tailored support for local regulations. By doing so, you keep more of what you earn and get your money faster.

Explore Skydo and see how you can streamline your international payments, so you spend less time worrying about wire transfers and more time growing your business globally.

Cross Border payments and how to receive them with Skydo

large_Cross Border payments and how to receive them with Skydo

medium_Cross Border payments and how to receive them with Skydo

small_Cross Border payments and how to receive them with Skydo

thumbnail_Cross Border payments and how to receive them with Skydo

If you get paid by US clients, ACH is often the easiest way for them to pay you, because it’s a domestic US bank transfer, not an international wire.

For Indian freelancers, agencies, and exporters, the practical question isn’t “What is ACH?”
It’s: How do I accept ACH payments from the US without opening a US entity or dealing with SWIFT delays and unpredictable deductions?

This guide answers that—clearly, end-to-end.

ACH stands for Automated Clearing House, the US network that moves money electronically between bank accounts.

Think of it as the “default rail” for:

ACH is built for volume and cost-efficiency, not instant settlement. It processes payments in batches during the day (with same-day options depending on the bank’s setup).&nbsp;

ACH Credit vs ACH Debit (and why it matters)

The biggest confusion is who initiates the payment.

Your client initiates the transfer from their bank account to yours.
This is the most common setup for freelancers/exporters getting paid by US businesses.

You (or your payment provider) initiates collection from the client’s bank account, only after authorisation. Debits have higher dispute/return risk than credits, so authorisation + clean records matter.

You don’t need to memorise acronyms, but understanding the flow helps when a payment is “stuck.”

The ACH network operates nearly the full banking day and settles multiple times daily.

What you need to receive ACH payments (and what NOT to share)

Use invoices, a client portal, or secure payment links. Avoid sending bank details in random screenshots or public chats.

How long does it take to receive ACH payments in India?

When people say “receive ACH in India,” they usually mean: how long until the money lands in my Indian bank account (INR) — not just when it reaches US banking rails.

1) US-side ACH processing (client → your US/virtual US account)

2) India-side payout (your provider → your Indian bank)

This depends on how you’re receiving ACH:

The real catch: returns, reversals, and dispute windows

ACH is cheap, but not “final” the way some people assume.

Many return reasons (wrong account, closed account, insufficient funds) are typically returned quickly, often within ~2 banking days, depending on the code.&nbsp;

For certain unauthorised consumer debit scenarios, the return/dispute timeline can extend to ~60 days and often requires a formal unauthorised statement process.&nbsp;

How to set up to receive ACH payments (2 practical options)

Option A: Receive ACH with a US bank account

If you already have a US-domiciled bank account that supports ACH:

Option B: Receive ACH using a FinTech virtual US account (common for India)

If you’re in India and don’t want to set up a US entity/bank relationship, many businesses use a virtual US account that provides:

Where Skydo fits (positioning without the hard sell)

Skydo is built for Indian businesses receiving international payments, especially from the US.

A practical “receiving ACH” playbook (templates)

1) Invoice payment instructions (paste into invoices)

“Please send payment via ACH transfer to:
 Routing Number: [ ] Account Number: [ ]
 Account Type: [Checking/Savings]
 Recipient Name: [Exact legal name on account]
 Payment Reference: [Invoice number / Project ID]”

“Sharing ACH details for the invoice payment:
 Routing Number: [ ]
 Account Number: [ ]
 Account Type: [ ]
 Recipient Name: [ ]

Please include the invoice number in the reference/memo field. Happy to help if your bank asks for any additional fields.”

Always require a unique reference (invoice number / contract ID). It saves hours later.

Conclusion: the simplest way to accept ACH

If your US clients want to pay via bank transfer, ACH is usually the most practical rail—cheap, familiar to US finance teams, and ideal for invoices/retainers.

If you already have a US bank account, setup is straightforward.
If you don’t (which is most Indian freelancers/exporters), a virtual US account route is typically the cleanest way to let clients pay via domestic ACH—without forcing SWIFT on them.

And if you want a setup that’s built specifically for Indian businesses receiving from the US, Skydo is designed to handle that workflow end-to-end: US receiving details, tracking/reconciliation, and settlement to INR at live forex rate, that too within 24 hours. Sign up today and see the difference for yourself.&nbsp;

large_Accept ACH payments

medium_Accept ACH payments

small_Accept ACH payments

thumbnail_Accept ACH payments

Accept ACH payments

In 2025, enterprise finance teams are waking up to a simple fact: the old ways won’t suffice anymore. Checks are fading fast, but digital rails haven’t fully taken over. The latest AFP Digital Payments Survey shows that only 26% of B2B disbursements are still made by check – a sharp drop from 33% just three years ago. In other words, checks now make up roughly one-quarter of B2B spend, down 7 points since 2022. Meanwhile, a full <a href="https://www.financialprofessionals.org/training-resources/resources/survey-research-economic-data/Details/digitalpayments#:~:text=%2A%20Looking%20ahead%2C%2076,in%202022">76% of organisations</a> report they will “update their payments strategy” within the next three years.&nbsp; Finance leaders increasingly recognise that a modern enterprise payment strategy must evolve beyond legacy systems and manual processes.

However, a deeper look at the data reveals a disconnect.  Only about 22% of companies say “most of their eligible B2B payments are digital” – roughly the same share as in 2019.  In short, even as check usage retreats, the pace of overall digital adoption has flat-lined.  This gap suggests that many firms still rely on checks or paper-based methods for a large slice of transactions, even as they plan to overhaul their payments programs.  Finance teams need to ask: What’s holding us back, and how can we reset our core payments approach?

Over the last two decades, checks have gone from dominant to minority status. The <a href="https://www.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpmorgan/images/payments/afp-digital-payments-survey-2025/2025-afp-digital-payments-survey-report-ada.pdf?">AFP survey </a>charts show that in 2004, over 80% of B2B payments were by check – today it’s only 26%. For corporate collections (incoming payments), the trend is similar: just 25% of customers now pay by check, down from 30% in 2022.

Source: <a href="https://www.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpmorgan/images/payments/afp-digital-payments-survey-2025/2025-afp-digital-payments-survey-report-ada.pdf">2025 AFP Digital Payments Survey Report, Underwritten by JP Morgan</a>

 This shift reflects growing trust in digital payments – faster networks, ERP systems, and bank integrations – but also the aftermath of external pressure.  For example, a 2025 U.S. Executive Order mandates that federal disbursements go fully electronic by Sept. 2025, sending a strong signal.

Despite the clear downward trend, the real surprise is how slow the flip has been. The survey notes that “the trend toward moving all eligible payments to digital methods has shown only modest growth”. In 2022, 24% of U.S. firms said most of their supplier payments were already digital; by 2025, that number fell to 22%. In other words, the share of companies fully embracing digital B2B payments hasn’t budged. That plateau suggests many organizations have digitized the easy part of their payments, but the last miles (smaller payees, legacy flows, edge cases) still run on paper.

The stubborn reliance on checks (and similar manual methods) isn’t due to ignorance – it’s a mix of practical barriers. <a href="https://www.nacha.org/news/over-21-years-massive-drop-b2b-check-payments-study-finds#:~:text=What%E2%80%99s%20holding%20back%20the%20stragglers%3F,accepting%20new%20processes%20and%20technologies">Survey respondents </a>highlight that vendors and customers often resist change. Many small suppliers “do not have the overhead to process several forms of electronic payment,” and may lack the necessary infrastructure or simply prefer the familiarity of checks. In fact, industry analysts note that common hurdles include the high cost of replacing old technology, the difficulty of onboarding small trading partners, and the straightforward comfort of familiar check workflows.

Other roadblocks stem from corporate IT.  Legacy accounting and ERP systems can be expensive to retool, making even migrating payment file formats (e.g. updating batch files to ISO-standard XML) a major project.  Many firms still lack real-time payment confirmation tools, so they stick with what they know.  A finance director quoted in the AFP survey put it bluntly: “We recognise the long-term benefits of digital payments – cost savings, speed and transparency – but the short-term disruption and upfront cost create a barrier to rapid adoption.”

In short, the barriers to going digital are often cultural and technical: smaller suppliers reluctant to change, entrenched legacy systems, and established check-based approval workflows.  These factors keep many organisations from fully committing to accounts payable automation and straight-through processing.  Until these obstacles are addressed, the bulk of B2B payments will not move online.

Rethinking Your Enterprise Payment Strategy

The good news is that nearly three-quarters of companies realize they need a new playbook.  According to the AFP, 76% of enterprises plan to refresh their payments strategy within three years.  That’s a mandate to action.  Finance and treasury leaders are now defining a baseline: what mix of payment rails do we use today, and what do we need tomorrow?  They’re also exploring new payment rails and channels – everything from real-time payments and RTP® networks to blockchain pilots and expanded global wires – to find faster, more secure alternatives.

Key strategic steps emerge from the survey insights.  Companies are focusing on:

These priorities are not pie-in-the-sky – they reflect practical projects Treasury and AP teams can do.  For example, defining baseline rail usage might start as a simple internal audit of AP/AR flows.  Expanding file formats could mean working with your bank or TMS to accept ISO files.  Each step lays the groundwork for broader change.

One concrete tactic many organisations are pursuing is check-to-ACH conversion.  Replacing outgoing checks with ACH transfers is low-hanging fruit: it cuts fraud risk, automates reconciliation, and is supported by virtually all suppliers.  Some companies even set policies like “max 10% of AP volume by check” to force migration.  Accounts payable teams can accelerate this by offering incentives (like earlier payment terms) for ACH invoices, or by implementing vendor portals that make ACH enrollment easy.

At the same time, accounts payable automation is becoming central to the strategy reset.  AP automation tools (often cloud-based) let firms route invoices, approvals and payments electronically, without rekeying.  In practice, this means invoices hit an AP portal or workflow instead of an inbox.  Once digital, payments can be routed via the best rail automatically (for example, client bills go via ACH, vendor refunds via RTP®).  This reduces human touch points and makes it easier to enforce payment policy changes.

Naturally, any major AP overhaul requires change management, but many recent surveys find that the ROI on AP automation is persuasive.  Fewer checks means fewer manual sign-offs, less postage, and lower error rates.  And with audit trails and reporting built in, controllers get visibility they never had with paper.  As one finance executive put it, the real gain isn’t just cost savings – it’s freeing up team bandwidth for strategic tasks.

The Digital Plateau: Addressing the Flatline

Despite these efforts, the AFP data remind us that digital adoption has stalled at around 20–25%.  Why?  Even companies on board with the vision often find only incremental progress.  For instance, the survey notes that the proportion of firms expecting to “convert all eligible payments to digital” over the next three years is still only about 72% – hardly higher than 2022.  Many organisations have already digitalised their large payments (high-volume, repeat suppliers) but struggle with the tail of low-volume vendors.

To break through the plateau, some treasurers are taking bold steps.  They negotiate with their 80/20 of suppliers, or invest in onboarding services for small businesses (outsourced banking portals, OCR for checks, even digital wallets).  Others implement flexible rails for small vendors – for example, sending B2B payment links or using virtual cards with dynamic limits.  Essentially, the goal is to make it as easy as possible for any payee to accept non-check funds.

Conclusion: Modernizing Without the IT Headache

Reimagining enterprise payments doesn’t always require a ground-up system rewrite.  Many firms are proving that incremental, focused changes to the core can pay off immediately.  For example, a mid-market company might start by automating vendor enrollment onto ACH, updating its ERP to support ISO files, and retraining AP staff on new policies.  Over time, those steps accumulate into a real transformation.

In fact, platform solutions are emerging to help organisations “operationalise” modern B2B payments without a massive IT lift. These cloud-based hubs connect ERPs, banks and suppliers to multiple rails and currencies. For instance, platforms like Skydo now offer virtual global accounts, automated invoicing, and multi-rail payment routing. A finance team in India can use such a platform to <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/how-to-receive-international-payments-in-india">receive international payments</a>, international invoices (achieving “check to ACH” or cross-border transfers) while automatically generating compliance docs – without rebuilding their back-end. The key is that these tools plug into existing workflows, gradually phasing out paper checks.

In 2025, the message is clear: finance teams must modernise their core or risk falling behind.  The declining check usage proves the demand is there, and three-quarters of firms are already resetting their strategy to meet it.  By recognising the human and technical barriers (vendor habits, legacy systems) and taking strategic steps (baseline analytics, file conversion, new rails), companies can unlock digital growth.  And with smart platforms (like Skydo) aiding the journey, even large enterprises can migrate tens of millions in B2B flows without a total IT overhaul.

Every CFO and treasurer today should be asking: How many more payments can we digitise?  Because the future of finance is digital, and&nbsp;the time to modernise is now.

Modernize the Core: Your B2B Payments Strategy Reset

large_Modernize the Core: Your B2B Payments Strategy Reset

medium_Modernize the Core: Your B2B Payments Strategy Reset

small_Modernize the Core: Your B2B Payments Strategy Reset

thumbnail_Modernize the Core: Your B2B Payments Strategy Reset

If you invoice a foreign client for $1,000, you expect to lose “maybe 1–3%” to fees.
In reality, international payments don’t lose money in one place—they lose money in layers.

A bank fee here. A correspondent fee there. A weak exchange rate in the middle. And by the time the INR hits your account, your payout can be materially lower than your invoice, without a clean breakdown explaining why.

Primary keywords covered: International Bank Transfer Fees, money transfer rates, <a href="https://www.skydo.com/blog/paypal-transaction-fees-india">paypal international transfer fee</a>, international wire transfer fee.

International Bank Transfer Fees — simple meaning

Growing Global

Understanding Global Payments blogs